Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Johnson
Pending Petition
Issue
Whether pleading an imprudent-investment claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, based on how the investment’s returns compared to some performance benchmark, requires allegations showing that the benchmark is a sound basis for comparison for that investment. CVSG: 12/09/2025
Mar 26, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)Apr 8, 2025Waiver of right of respondent Michael D. Johnson, et al. to respond filed.
Apr 16, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/2/2025.
Apr 21, 2025Response Requested. (Due May 21, 2025)
May 21, 2025Brief of respondents Michael D. Johnson, et al. in opposition filed.May 21, 2025Brief amicus curiae of Encore Fiduciary filed.Jun 9, 2025Reply of petitioners Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)Jun 10, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
Jun 30, 2025The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration of this petition.
Dec 9, 2025Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Dec 23, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
Dec 23, 2025Supplemental brief of respondents Michael D. Johnson, et al. filed. (Distributed)Dec 23, 2025Supplemental brief of petitioners Parker-Hannifin Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)Jan 12, 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
Recommended Citation: Parker-Hannifin Corporation v. Johnson, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/parker-hannifin-corporation-v-johnson/