Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, California
Holding
Administrative exhaustion of state remedies is not a prerequisite for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 takings claim when the government has reached a conclusive position.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 9-0 on Jun 28, 2021.
Feb 26, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021)Mar 4, 2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al.Mar 18, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 23, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021.
Apr 1, 2021Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed.Apr 1, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed.Apr 2, 2021Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.May 3, 2021Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.May 14, 2021Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed)May 18, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
Jun 1, 2021Rescheduled.
Jun 7, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
Jun 8, 2021Rescheduled.
Jun 14, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
Jun 21, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
Jun 28, 2021Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)
Jul 30, 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco, California, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/pakdel-v-city-and-county-of-san-francisco-california/