Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Lytle
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on March 3, 2025.
Issue
Whether, when a plaintiff seeking to certify a class relies on an expert to establish that classwide issues predominate, the expert testimony must satisfy the requirements for admissibility.
Nov 21, 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2024)Dec 5, 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2024 to January 27, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 6, 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2025.
Dec 20, 2024Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.Jan 27, 2025Brief of respondents Justin Lytle, et al. in opposition filed.Feb 11, 2025Reply of petitioners Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Feb 12, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
Mar 3, 2025Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Lytle, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/nutramax-laboratories-inc-v-lytle/