Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.
Holding
Under the Class Action Fairness Act, because Mississippi is the only named plaintiff, the suit does not qualify as a "mass actions" " that is, a civil action "in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiff's claims involve common questions of law or fact."
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Sonia Sotomayor on Jan 14, 2014.
Issue: Whether a state”s parens patriae action is removable as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act when the state is the sole plaintiff, the claims arise under state law, and the state attorney general possesses statutory and common-law authority to assert all claims in the complaint.
Recommended Citation: Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/mississippi-ex-rel-hood-v-au-optronics-corp/