Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc.
Holding
The well-grounded patent law doctrine of assignor estoppel applies only when the assignor's claim of invalidity contradicts explicit or implicit representations the assignor made in assigning the patent.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Elena Kagan on Jun 29, 2021. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Barrett filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined.
Sep 30, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)Oct 14, 2020Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.Nov 5, 2020Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.Nov 5, 2020Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Professors filed.Nov 5, 2020Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.
Nov 24, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.
Nov 24, 2020Rescheduled.
Nov 24, 2020Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.Dec 9, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
Jan 8, 2021Petition GRANTED.
Feb 22, 2021Brief of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.Feb 22, 2021Joint appendix volumes 1 and 2 with supplemental appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)Feb 22, 2021Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.Feb 25, 2021Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.Feb 26, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.Mar 1, 2021Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.Mar 1, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed in support of neither party.Mar 1, 2021Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed in support of neither party.Mar 1, 2021Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.Mar 1, 2021Brief amicus curiae of New York City Bar Association in support of neither party filed.Mar 12, 2021SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.
Mar 15, 2021Record requested.
Mar 24, 2021Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. filed.Mar 26, 2021Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.Mar 30, 2021CIRCULATED
Mar 31, 2021Brief amicus curiae of United Therapeutics Corp. filed. (Distributed)Mar 31, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. (Distributed)Mar 31, 2021Brief amici curiae of Leading Technology Composites, Inc. and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC filed. (Distributed)Apr 5, 2021Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
Apr 7, 2021Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Apr 21, 2021Argued. For petitioner: Robert N. Hochman, Chicago, Ill. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew M. Wolf, Washington, D. C.
Jun 29, 2021Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Barrett, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.
Aug 2, 2021JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/minerva-surgical-inc-v-hologic-inc/