Miller v. Inslee
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 7, 2019.
Issue
Whether Washington"s compelling nonmember providers to accept a private organization as their exclusive representative for dealing with the state over public policy is one of the "other contexts" in which the "significant impingement on associational freedoms" is not tolerated by the First Amendment.
May 24, 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2019)May 30, 2019Waiver of right of respondents Jay Inslee; Cheryl Strange; David Schumacher to respond filed.May 30, 2019Waiver of right of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 to respond filed.
Jun 4, 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
Jun 14, 2019Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed.Jun 18, 2019Response Requested. (Due July 18, 2019)
Jun 25, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 18, 2019 to August 27, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.Jun 26, 2019Blanket Consent filed on behalf of Petitioner, and respondents.Jul 2, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 27, 2019, for all respondents.
Jul 16, 2019Brief amici curiae of Buckeye Institute, et al., filed.Jul 18, 2019Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.Aug 27, 2019Brief of respondent Service Employees International Union, Local 925 in opposition filed.Aug 27, 2019Brief of respondents State of Washington in opposition filed.Sep 10, 2019Reply of petitioner Katherine Miller filed.Sep 11, 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
Oct 7, 2019Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Miller v. Inslee, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/miller-v-inslee/