Metrish v. Lancaster
Holding
Because the Michigan Court of Appeals did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law when it retroactively applied a decision of the Michigan Supreme Court rejecting the diminished-capacity defense to petitioner, who was charged with a murder that occurred several years before the Michigan Supreme Court"s decision, petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief.
Judgment
Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Ruth Bader Ginsburg on May 20, 2013.
Holding: Because the Michigan Court of Appeals did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law when it retroactively applied a decision of the Michigan Supreme Court rejecting the diminished-capacity defense to petitioner, who was charged with a murder that occurred several years before the Michigan Supreme Court”s decision, petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief.
Judgment:”Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on May 20, 2013.
Recommended Citation: Metrish v. Lancaster, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/metrish-v-lancaster/