Douglas v. California Pharmacists Association
Holding
The parties will argue before the Ninth Circuit in the first instance whether the respondents may maintain Supremacy Clause actions in light of the approval by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the challenged California statutes that reduce the amount of Medicaid reimbursement.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Feb 22, 2012. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.
Merits Briefs for Petitioner
- Brief for Toby Douglas
- Reply brief for” Toby Douglas
- Toby Douglas” supplemental brief letter
- Toby Douglas” supplemental Exhibit B
- Toby Douglas supplemental Exhibit B1
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioner
- Brief for the United States
- Brief for National Governors Association et al.
- Brief for Michigan and 30 Other States
- Brief for National Governors Association et al.
Merits Briefs for the Respondents
- Brief for the Dominguez respondents
- Brief for Intervenor respondents and the California Pharmacists Association respondents
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondents
- Brief for Members of Congress
- Brief for the National Association of Chain Drug Stores et al.
- Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
- Brief for the American Medical Association et al.
- Brief for the American Health Care Association et al.
- Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union et al.
- Brief for AARP, Families USA et al.
- Brief for Former HSS Officials
Other Documents
[##CERT-STAGE##]
Recommended Citation: Douglas v. California Pharmacists Association, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/maxwell-jolly-v-california-pharmacists-association/