Skip to main content

Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges

Pending Petition
Docket No.25-767
Op. Below4th Cir.

Issue

(1) Whether the decision below — in which the court of appeals held, without notice to or briefing by the parties, that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 does not preclude suit in district court when “a factual record” shows that the CSRA is not “function[ing] as intended” — should be summarily reversed for violating the party-presentation principle; and (2) whether the decision below should be summarily reversed for failing to adhere to this court’s precedents holding that the CSRA generally precludes challenges to federal personnel actions in district court.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Dec 23, 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2026)
Jan 6, 2026
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 30, 2026 to March 1, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Jan 7, 2026
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2026. See Rule 30.1.
Jan 30, 2026
Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senator Ted Budd, et al. filed.
Mar 2, 2026
Brief of respondent National Association of Immigration Judges in opposition filed.
Mar 10, 2026
Waiver of Daren K. Margolin of the 14-day waiting period not accepted for filing. (March 10, 2026 - Filer's request)
Mar 11, 2026
Reply of petitioner Daren K. Margolin filed.
Apr 8, 2026
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.