Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges
Pending Petition
Issue
(1) Whether the decision below — in which the court of appeals held, without notice to or briefing by the parties, that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 does not preclude suit in district court when “a factual record” shows that the CSRA is not “function[ing] as intended” — should be summarily reversed for violating the party-presentation principle; and (2) whether the decision below should be summarily reversed for failing to adhere to this court’s precedents holding that the CSRA generally precludes challenges to federal personnel actions in district court.
Dec 23, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 30, 2026)Jan 6, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 30, 2026 to March 1, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Jan 7, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 2, 2026. See Rule 30.1.
Jan 30, 2026Brief amici curiae of U.S. Senator Ted Budd, et al. filed.Mar 2, 2026Brief of respondent National Association of Immigration Judges in opposition filed.Mar 10, 2026Waiver of Daren K. Margolin of the 14-day waiting period not accepted for filing. (March 10, 2026 - Filer's request)
Mar 11, 2026Reply of petitioner Daren K. Margolin filed.Apr 8, 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.
Recommended Citation: Margolin v. National Association of Immigration Judges, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/margolin-v-national-association-of-immigration-judges-2/