Macy’s Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Pending Petition
Issue
(1) Whether an employer’s practice that has no noted effect on employees’ collective-bargaining rights and is not motivated by anti-union animus is inherently destructive of union rights and violates the National Labor Relations Act; and (2) whether the National Labor Relations Board has the statutory or constitutional authority to order employers to pay “any … direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms” their employees incur “as a result of” an unlawful labor practice.
Nov 26, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 2, 2026)Dec 9, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2026 to February 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 10, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 2, 2026, for all respondents. (Docket entry updated 12/18/25)
Dec 22, 2025Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.Jan 2, 2026Brief amici curiae of Former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III, et al. filed.Jan 23, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 2, 2026 to March 4, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.Jan 27, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 4, 2026, for all respondents.
Feb 24, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 4, 2026 to April 3, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.Feb 27, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 3, 2026, for all respondents.
Mar 25, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 3, 2026 to May 4, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 27, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 4, 2026, for all respondents.
Recommended Citation: Macy’s Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/macys-inc-v-national-labor-relations-board/