Lyft, Inc. v. Seifu
Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
Docket No.21-742
Op. BelowCal. Ct. App.
Issue
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires the enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that a worker cannot raise representative claims under California"s Private Attorneys General Act, thereby preempting the contrary holding in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC.
Nov 16, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)
Jan 5, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
Jan 13, 2022Response Requested. (Due February 14, 2022)
Feb 14, 2022Brief of respondent Million Seifu in opposition filed.Mar 2, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
Jun 21, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
Jun 27, 2022Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
Jul 29, 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED
Recommended Citation: Lyft, Inc. v. Seifu, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/lyft-inc-v-seifu/