Lefemine v. Wideman
Holding
In a lawsuit alleging that the conduct of government officials violates the Constitution, a plaintiff who obtains a permanent injunction but no money damages is a "prevailing party" because the injunction ordered the officials to change their behavior in a way that directly benefitted the plaintiff. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to receive his attorney"s fees unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.
Judgment
Granted, vacated and remanded on Nov 5, 2012.
Holding: In a lawsuit alleging that the conduct of government officials violates the Constitution, a plaintiff who obtains a permanent injunction but no money damages is a “prevailing party” because the injunction ordered the officials to change their behavior in a way that directly benefitted the plaintiff. The plaintiff is therefore entitled to receive his attorney”s fees unless special circumstances would render such an award unjust.
Judgment:”Granted, vacated and remanded“in a per curiam opinion on November 5, 2012.
Recommended Citation: Lefemine v. Wideman, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/lefemine-v-wideman/