KBR, Incorporated v. Metzgar
Petition for certiorari denied on January 20, 2015.
Issue
(1) Whether the political question doctrine bars state-law tort claims against a battlefield support contractor operating in an active war zone when adjudication of those claims would necessarily require examining sensitive military judgments; (2) whether the Federal Tort Claim Act's "combatant-activities exception," 28 U.S.C. § 2680(j), preempts state-law tort claims against a battlefield support contractor that arise out of the U.S. military's combatant activities in a theater of combat; and (3) whether the doctrine of derivative sovereign immunity bars state-law tort claims against a private contractor performing delegated public functions where the government would be immune from suit if it performed the same functions. CVSG: 12/16/2014.
Recommended Citation: KBR, Incorporated v. Metzgar, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/kbr-incorporated-v-metzgar-2/