J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Holding
A child's age is a relevant factor to consider in determining whether the child is in custody for purposes of Miranda v. Arizona.
Judgment
Supreme Court of North Carolina reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Sonia Sotomayor on Jun 16, 2011. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Scalia and Thomas.
Merits Briefs
Amicus Briefs
- Brief for Center on Wrongful Convictions of Youth, et al., in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Juvenile Law Center, et al. in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the American Civil Liberties Union in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the American Bar Association in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for the United States of America in Support of Respondent
- Brief of Indiana, Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming in Support of Respondent
- Brief of the National District Attorney’s Association in Support of Respondent
[##CERT-STAGE##]
Recommended Citation: J.D.B. v. North Carolina, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/j-d-b-v-north-carolina/