Impax Laboratories, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

(1) Whether the presence of a "reverse payment" that exceeds a patentee"s saved litigation costs and the value of any services provided by a patent challenger suffices to render a patent settlement unlawful, despite the Supreme Court"s holding to the contrary in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.; and (2) whether courts reviewing antitrust challenges to patent settlements can disregard evidence of the strength of the patents at issue, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held here, or instead whether they must consider what "the patent"s strength would otherwise permit," as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit held in King Drug Co. of Florence v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.