Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on June 12, 2023.
Issue
Whether federal courts have authority to review the Tennessee Valley Authority"s fidelity to its enabling statute, or whether the Authority"s rate-setting is excepted from all judicial review even when it sets rates in deliberate disregard of Congress" clearly expressed policy directive.
Nov 14, 2022Application (22A436) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 6, 2022 to January 5, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Nov 16, 2022Application (22A436) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 5, 2023.
Jan 5, 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)Jan 30, 2023Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to March 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.Jan 31, 2023Motion of BVU Authority to extend the time to file a response from February 8, 2023 to March 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.Feb 1, 2023The motions to extend the time to file responses are granted and the time is extended to and including March 10, 2023, for all respondents.
Mar 2, 2023Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2023 to May 9, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 2, 2023Motion BVU Authority to extend the time to file a response from March 10, 2023 to May 9, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 3, 2023The motions to extend the time to file responses are granted and the time is further extended to and including May 9, 2023, for all respondents.
May 9, 2023Brief of Federal Respondent in opposition filed.May 9, 2023Brief of respondent BVU Authority in opposition filed.May 18, 2023Reply of petitioner David Holbrook filed.May 23, 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
Jun 12, 2023Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Holbrook v. Tennessee Valley Authority, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/holbrook-v-tennessee-valley-authority/