Handy Technologies, Inc. v. Pote
Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
Docket No.21-1121
Op. BelowCal. Ct. App.
Issue
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot raise representative claims, including under the California Private Attorneys General Act.
Feb 4, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 16, 2022)Feb 25, 2022Waiver of right of respondent Patrick Pote to respond filed.
Mar 16, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
Mar 18, 2022Response Requested. (Due April 18, 2022)
Apr 15, 2022Brief of respondent Patrick Pote filed.May 3, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
Jun 21, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
Jun 27, 2022Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
Jul 29, 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED
Recommended Citation: Handy Technologies, Inc. v. Pote, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/handy-technologies-inc-v-pote/