Hamm v. Sockwell
Application for stay of mandate denied on Oct. 8, 2025.
Sep 25, 2025Application (25A347) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Sep 26, 2025Order entered by Justice Thomas: Upon consideration of the application for the applicant, it is ordered that the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, case No. 23-13321, is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court. It is further ordered that a response to the application be filed on or before Friday, October 3, 2025, by 4 p.m. (EDT).
Oct 3, 2025Response to application from respondent Michael Sockwell filed.Oct 6, 2025Reply of applicant John Hamm filed.Oct 8, 2025Application (25A347) referred to the Court.
Oct 8, 2025Application (25A347) for stay presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied. The denial is without prejudice to a reapplication if a new trial is imminent. See Calderon v. Moore, 518 U. S. 149 (1996) (per curiam); Garrison v. Hudson, 468 U. S. 1301 (1984) (Burger, C. J., in chambers). The order heretofore entered by Justice Thomas is vacated.
Recommended Citation: Hamm v. Sockwell, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/hamm-v-sockwell/