Gunn v. Minton
Holding
28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), which provides for exclusive federal jurisdiction over an case "arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents," does not deprive the state courts of subject matter jurisdiction over a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in a patent case.
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by John Roberts on Feb 20, 2013.
Holding: 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a), which provides for exclusive federal jurisdiction over an case “arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents,” does not deprive the state courts of subject matter jurisdiction over a state law claim alleging legal malpractice in a patent case.
Judgment:”Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Chief Justice Roberts on February 20, 2013.
Recommended Citation: Gunn v. Minton, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/gunn-v-minton/