General Dynamics Corp. v. Scharpf
Pending Petition
Issue
Whether plaintiffs adequately plead that defendants engaged in fraudulent concealment, for purposes of tolling the 15 U.S.C. § 15b (Clayton Act) statute of limitations, by alleging that defendants maintained an unwritten agreement.
Sep 11, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 15, 2025)Sep 23, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2025 to November 14, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
Sep 25, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2025.
Oct 15, 2025Brief amicus curiae of Shipbuilders Council of America filed.Oct 15, 2025Brief amici curiae of United States Chamber of Commerce, et al. filed.Oct 30, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2025 to November 21, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.Oct 31, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 21, 2025.
Nov 21, 2025Brief of respondent Susan Scharpf in opposition filed.Dec 9, 2025Reply of petitioners General Dynamics Corp., et al. filed. (Distributed)Dec 10, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
Jan 12, 2026The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Recommended Citation: General Dynamics Corp. v. Scharpf, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/general-dynamics-corp-v-scharpf/