Skip to main content

Furry v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida

Certiorari Denied

Petition for certiorari denied on November 26, 2012.

Docket No.12-376
Op. Below11th Cir.

Issue

(1) Whether Justice Brandeis"s opinion in Turner v. United States supports the concept of tribal sovereign immunity or should that accidental doctrine, questioned in Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc., be revised and discarded, at least in the context of tribal alcoholic beverage commercial activities; (2) whether 18 U.S.C. § 1161 and Rice v. Rehner exclude tribal alcoholic beverage endeavors from sovereign immunity protection; and (3) whether tribal sovereign immunity precludes a suit against an Indian Tribe which has obtained a state liquor license and has operated an alcoholic beverage facility pursuant to that liquor license and in the process has violated state law subjecting a license holder to liability.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Sep 21, 2012
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2012)
Oct 25, 2012
Brief of respondent Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida in opposition filed.
Nov 2, 2012
Reply of petitioner John V. Furry, as Personal Representative of the Estate and Survivors of Tatiana H. Furry filed.
Nov 5, 2012
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 20, 2012.
Nov 26, 2012
Petition DENIED.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.