Fry v. Rand Construction Corp.
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on May 3, 2021.
Issue
(1) Whether the lower court erred in adopting what is, in essence, a "sole cause" standard for a "but-for" cause, in direct conflict with the Supreme Court"s holdings in Burrage v. United States and Bostock v. Clayton County; and (2) whether the correct causation standard for petitioner Arlene Fry's Family and Medical Leave Act claim is but-for, motivating factor or negative factor.
Dec 23, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 29, 2021)Jan 15, 2021Waiver of right of respondent Rand Construction Corporation to respond filed.
Jan 20, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
Jan 25, 2021Response Requested. (Due February 24, 2021)
Feb 8, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 24, 2021 to March 26, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.Feb 9, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 26, 2021.
Mar 26, 2021Brief of respondent Rand Construction Corporation in opposition filed.Apr 8, 2021Reply of petitioner Arlene Fry filed.Apr 14, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
May 3, 2021Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Fry v. Rand Construction Corp., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/fry-v-rand-construction-corp/