Fred Martin Motor Co. v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2015.
Issue
Whether, by reopening the final order of a federal bankruptcy court and permitting a private arbitrator to reverse it, Section 747 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 is unconstitutional.
Jun 11, 2015Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 13, 2015)
Jun 22, 2015Waiver of right of respondent Dick Scott, Inc. d/b/a Dick Scott Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram to respond filed.
Jun 24, 2015Waiver of right of respondent Livonia Chrysler Jeep, Inc. to respond filed.
Jul 1, 2015Waiver of right of respondent FLA, US, LLC to respond filed.
Jul 1, 2015Waiver of right of respondents Suburban of Troy, et al. to respond filed.
Jul 2, 2015Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Jul 10, 2015Brief of respondent Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC in opposition filed.
Jul 13, 2015Brief of respondents Fox Hills Motor Sales, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Jul 29, 2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.
Sep 4, 2015Reply of petitioner Fred Martin Motor Company filed. (Distributed)Oct 5, 2015Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Fred Martin Motor Co. v. Spitzer Autoworld Akron, LLC, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/fred-martin-motor-co-v-spitzer-autoworld-akron-llc/