Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research
Holding
The universal-service contribution scheme does not violate the Constitution’s nondelegation doctrine; Congress sufficiently guided and constrained the discretion that it lodged with the Federal Communications Commission to implement that scheme, and the FCC has retained all decision-making authority within that sphere, relying on the Universal Service Administrative Company only for non-binding advice.
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Elena Kagan on Jun 27, 2025. Justices Kavanaugh and Jackson filed concurring opinions. Justice Gorsuch filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Thomas and Alito.
Recommended Citation: Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/federal-communications-commission-v-consumers-research/