Elhady v. Bradley
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 11, 2022.
Issue
(1) Whether, in an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity, a court of appeals always has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to decide whether a remedy exists under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents for the claim against which the appellant asserts qualified immunity; and (2) whether Bivens claims are categorically precluded at the border, even when the plaintiff is a U.S. citizen who challenges mistreatment on U.S. soil by federal law-enforcement officers performing traditional law-enforcement duties.
Apr 13, 2022Application (21A607) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 25, 2022 to May 25, 2022, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Apr 14, 2022Application (21A607) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until May 25, 2022.
May 25, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 27, 2022)Jun 7, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 27, 2022 to July 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Jun 9, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 27, 2022.
Jul 12, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 27, 2022 to August 26, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Jul 14, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 26, 2022.
Aug 26, 2022Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.Sep 13, 2022Reply of petitioner Anas Elhady filed. (Distributed)Sep 14, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
Oct 11, 2022Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Elhady v. Bradley, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/elhady-v-bradley/