Eizember v. United States
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya on May 14, 2018.
Docket No.17-6117
Issue
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit erred when it denied a certificate of appealability regarding petitioner"s claim that the definition of a "crime of violence" in 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(B) is unconstitutionally vague in light of Johnson v. United States.
Sep 22, 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 26, 2017)
Oct 4, 2017Waiver of right of respondents United States to respond filed.
Oct 12, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2017.
Oct 17, 2017Response Requested. (Due November 16, 2017)
Nov 16, 2017Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2017 to December 18, 2017, submitted to The Clerk.Nov 17, 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 18, 2017.
Dec 18, 2017Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.Jan 4, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/19/2018.
Apr 17, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018.
Apr 23, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.
May 7, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.
May 14, 2018Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U. S. ____ (2018).
Jun 15, 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Eizember v. United States, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/eizember-v-united-states/