Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Anderson
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on January 18, 2022.
Issue
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, in conflict with other U.S. Courts of Appeals, erred in concluding that Chadbourne & Parke v. Troice narrowed Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Dabit"s interpretation of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act"s "in connection with" prong to require that the alleged deception induce a specific transaction in a particular covered security.
Oct 12, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 15, 2021)Oct 28, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 15, 2021 to December 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Oct 29, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 15, 2021.
Nov 15, 2021Brief amici curiae of Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, et al., filed.Dec 15, 2021Brief of respondents Edward Anderson, et al. in opposition filed.Dec 29, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
Dec 29, 2021Reply of petitioners Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P., et al. filed. (Distributed)Jan 18, 2022Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P. v. Anderson, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/edward-d-jones-co-l-p-v-anderson/