Dolgen California, LLC v. Galarsa
Petition granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
Docket No.21-1444
Op. BelowCal. Ct. App.
Issue
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that an employee cannot assert representative claims, including under the California Private Attorneys General Act.
May 9, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 15, 2022)May 27, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 15, 2022 to July 15, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
May 31, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2022.
Jul 15, 2022Brief of respondent Tricia Galarsa in opposition filed.Aug 3, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
Oct 3, 2022Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
Nov 4, 2022Judgment and mandate issued.Recommended Citation: Dolgen California, LLC v. Galarsa, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/dolgen-california-llc-v-galarsa/