Doe v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc.
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on May 24, 2021.
Issue
(1) Whether, on de novo consideration of a benefits claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, summary judgment must be denied if there is a genuine dispute of material fact; and (2) whether, on de novo consideration of an ERISA benefits claim and absent a challenge to the plan"s procedures, a district court has discretion to consider evidence that was not part of the record before the plan administrator.
Feb 5, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 15, 2021)Feb 24, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 15, 2021 to April 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Feb 25, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 14, 2021.
Apr 14, 2021Brief of respondents Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. and the Harvard Pilgrim PPO Plan Massachusetts, Group Policy Number 0588660000 in opposition filed.May 3, 2021Reply of petitioner Jane Doe filed. (Distributed)May 4, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
May 24, 2021Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Doe v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/doe-v-harvard-pilgrim-health-care-inc/