Deasey v. Slater
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 13, 2020.
Issue
Whether, for purposes of qualified immunity, a merely "sufficiently analogous" case is enough to show that the law is "clearly established," or whether something more is required, i.e., a "closely analogous" case finding the alleged violation unlawful.
Mar 2, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2020)
Apr 15, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2020.
Apr 29, 2020Response Requested. (Due May 29, 2020)
May 20, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 29, 2020 to June 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.May 21, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 29, 2020.
Jun 25, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 29, 2020 to July 29, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jun 26, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 29, 2020.
Jul 21, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 29, 2020 to August 28, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jul 22, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2020.
Aug 28, 2020Brief of respondents Daniella Slater, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 14, 2020Reply of petitioners Deputy Shannon Deasey, Deputy Peter Gentry, Deputy Gary Brandt, Sgt. Mike Rude, and County of San Bernardino filed. (Distributed)Sep 16, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
Oct 13, 2020Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Deasey v. Slater, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/deasey-v-slater/