Craig v. Krueger

(1) Whether the 10th Circuit erred in denying qualified immunity to petitioners on the issue of excessive force without conducting an individualized qualified immunity analysis, but engaged, at least in part, in a “collective” qualified immunity analysis which considered the aggregate actions of multiple officers at the scene; and (2) whether, in denying qualified immunity, the 10th Circuit evaluated whether the right at issue was “clearly established” at an impermissibly high level of generality, contrary to Kisela v. Hughes, City & County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd.