Conagra Brands, Inc. v. Brise”o
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 10, 2017.
Issue
Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 permits a district court to certify a damages class where there is no reliable, administratively feasible method of identifying the members of the class.
Apr 10, 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 12, 2017)
Apr 18, 2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 16, 2017.
Apr 27, 2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.
May 1, 2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for respondents.
May 12, 2017Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.May 12, 2017Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.May 12, 2017Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers filed.May 12, 2017Brief amicus curiae of The Grocery Manufacturers Association filed.Jun 16, 2017Brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. in opposition filed.Jul 5, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.
Jul 5, 2017Reply of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Jul 11, 2017Supplemental brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. filed. (Distributed)Jul 13, 2017Supplemental brief of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Aug 18, 2017Second supplemental brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. filed. (Distributed)Aug 18, 2017Second supplemental brief of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Sep 21, 2017Rescheduled.
Oct 2, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
Oct 10, 2017Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Conagra Brands, Inc. v. Brise”o, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/conagra-brands-inc-v-briseno/