Skip to main content

CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. Frescati Shipping Company

Certiorari Denied

Petition for certiorari denied on February 24, 2014.

Docket No.13-462
Op. Below3d Cir.

Issue

(1) Whether a safe berth provision in a voyage charter contract is a guarantee of the safety of the berth, rather than a duty of due diligence, and whether such a contractual provision runs to the benefit of a third-party vessel owner when there is no evidence of the contracting parties" intent to benefit the vessel owner; and (2) whether a wharf owner"s tort duty to provide a safe approach extends to routes selected exclusively by a vessel"s navigators in federally maintained waters over which the wharf owner does not exercise dominion or control.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Oct 10, 2013
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 14, 2013)
Oct 16, 2013
Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner CITCO.
Nov 5, 2013
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 16, 2013, for all respondents.
Nov 8, 2013
Brief amici curiae of South Jersey Port Corporation, et al. filed.
Nov 8, 2013
Brief amicus curiae of Plains Products Terminals LLC filed.
Dec 10, 2013
Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 15, 2014, for all respondents.
Jan 15, 2014
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Jan 15, 2014
Brief of respondents Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd., et al. in opposition filed.
Jan 17, 2014
Additional authorities received from counsel for respondents Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd., et al..
Jan 28, 2014
Reply of petitioners CITGO Asphalt Refining Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Jan 29, 2014
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 21, 2014.
Feb 24, 2014
Petition DENIED.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.