Turaani v. Wray
Petition for certiorari denied on October 4, 2021
Issue: Whether the standing analysis for Privacy Act improper disclosure claims requires determining if the plaintiff sufficiently alleged an "adverse effect" to satisfy traceability, as recognized by previous decisions of the Supreme Court, as opposed to requiring allegations of a "command" or "compulsion," and if so, whether a plaintiff can demonstrate that adverse effect by alleging that the government"s improper disclosures produced a determinative or coercive effect on a third party who refuses to do business with the plaintiff.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The Penobscot River and claims against military subcontractors (Andrew Hamm, December 24, 2021)
- Intervention in Title IX proceedings and unlawful disclosures under the Privacy Act (Mitchell Jagodinski, July 30, 2021)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
07/16/2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 19, 2021) |
08/18/2021 | Waiver of right of respondent Wray, Christopher, et al. to respond filed. |
08/25/2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021. |
10/04/2021 | Petition DENIED. |