SAP SE v. Teradata Corporation
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2025
Issues: (1) Whether the rule of reason properly governs tying claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act concerning software products that are technologically integrated—including when, as here, the tied product is sold separately from the tying product; and (2) whether the court’s precedents applying a per se rule to analyze the lawfulness of tying arrangements under Section 1 should be overruled.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 06/02/2025 | Motion (24M98) of petitioners for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed. |
| 06/02/2025 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 30, 2025) |
| 06/10/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025. |
| 06/30/2025 | Motion (24M98) Granted. |
| 06/30/2025 | Waiver of right of respondent Teradata Corporation, et al. to respond filed. |
| 07/02/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025. |
| 07/09/2025 | Letter of July 7, 2025 from counsel for petitioners recevied. |
| 07/11/2025 | Response Requested. (Due August 11, 2025) |
| 07/15/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2025 to August 25, 2025, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 07/16/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 25, 2025. |
| 08/11/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. |
| 08/11/2025 | Brief amici curiae of Microsoft Corporation, et al. filed. |
| 08/25/2025 | Brief of respondents Teradata Corporation, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 09/10/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025. |
| 09/10/2025 | Reply of petitioners SAP SE, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/06/2025 | Petition DENIED. |