Noem v. Perdomo
Emergency application for stay of district court order
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay a district court order preventing federal immigration officers from conducting detentive stops in seven southern California counties, including Los Angeles, without reasonable suspicion.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The Trump administration puts ethnicity on the court’s emergency docket (César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, August 19, 2025)
- Groups ask Supreme Court to keep in place district court ruling barring immigration stops (Amy Howe, August 12, 2025)
- Trump administration urges Supreme Court to block district court ruling preventing immigration stops (Amy Howe, August 7, 2025)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/07/2025 | Application (25A169) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
| 08/08/2025 | Response to application (25A169) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 5 p.m. (EDT) on August 12, 2025. |
| 08/12/2025 | Amicus brief of Federation for American Immigration Reform submitted. |
| 08/12/2025 | Response of Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, et al. to application submitted. |
| 08/12/2025 | Amicus brief of The City of Los Angeles, The County of Los Angeles and 20 Central District Cities submitted. |
| 08/13/2025 | Reply of applicant Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. |