Skip to content

Luis v. United States

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-419 11th Cir. Nov 10, 2015 May 1, 2025 5-3 Breyer OT 2015

Holding: The pretrial freeze of a criminal defendant's legitimate, untainted assets violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel of choice.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-3, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 1, 2025. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/07/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 10, 2014)
10/16/2014Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
10/20/2014Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party received from counsel for the petitioner.
10/22/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014.
10/28/2014Response Requested . (Due November 28, 2014)
11/18/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 29, 2014.
11/26/2014Brief amici curiae of U.S. Justice Foundation, et al. filed.
11/28/2014Brief amici curiae of Associations of Criminal Defense Attorneys filed.
12/23/2014Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including February 27, 2015.
02/18/2015Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including March 30, 2015.
03/30/2015Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
04/15/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.
04/16/2015Reply of petitioner Sila Luis filed. (Distributed)
05/01/2015Rescheduled.
05/04/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015.
05/18/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 21, 2015.
05/26/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 28, 2015.
06/01/2015DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 4, 2015.
06/08/2015Petition GRANTED.
06/15/2015The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 18, 2015.
06/15/2015The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 30, 2015.
08/04/2015Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs in support of either party, or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioner.
08/18/2015Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
08/18/2015Brief of petitioner Sila Luis filed.
08/25/2015Brief amici curiae of United States Justice Foundation, et al. filed.
08/25/2015Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and the DKT Liberty Project filed.
08/25/2015Brief amici curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.
08/25/2015Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Forfeiture Reform filed.
08/25/2015Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.
08/25/2015Brief amicus curiae of American Bar Association filed.
08/25/2015Brief amicus curiae of Rutherford Institute filed.
09/09/2015SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, November 10, 2015
09/10/2015Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit.
09/21/2015Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Florida is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of one SEALED Document. (1 envelope)
09/22/2015The record from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.
09/30/2015Brief of respondent United States filed.
10/02/2015CIRCULATED
10/07/2015Brief amici curiae of National Association of State Legislators, et al. filed. (Distributed)
10/09/2015Motion of Americans for Forfeiture Reform out-of-time for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
10/29/2015Reply of petitioner Sila Luis filed. (Distributed)
10/30/2015Motion of Americans for Forfeiture Reform out-of-time for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument DENIED.
11/10/2015Argued. For petitioner: Howard Srebnick, Miami, Fla. For respondent: Michael R. Dreeben, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.
03/30/2016Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which Roberts, C. J., and Ginsburg and Sotomayor, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Kennedy, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Alito, J., joined. Kagan, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
05/02/2016JUDGMENT ISSUED
07/26/2016Records from U.S.D.C. Southern Dist. of Florida has been returned.