Skip to content

Flynt v. Bonta

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-173 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether a state law that discriminates against firms engaged in interstate commerce by forcing firms to choose between being part of the enacting state’s intrastate market, or the interstate markets of the other states, but not both, violates the dormant commerce clause.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/30/2025Application (24A1185) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 12, 2025 to August 11, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
06/03/2025Application (24A1185) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 11, 2025.
08/11/2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 12, 2025)
08/26/2025Waiver of right of respondents Rob Bonta, et al. to respond filed.
09/24/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
10/02/2025Response Requested. (Due November 3, 2025)
10/17/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 3, 2025 to December 3, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
10/20/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2025.
12/03/2025Brief of respondents Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, et al. in opposition filed.
12/16/2025Reply of petitioner Elizabeth Flynt filed.
12/23/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.