Skip to content

Five Star Senior Living Inc. v. Mandviwala

Petition for certiorari denied on June 25, 2018

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
17-1357 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: (1) Whether a California rule that prohibits the enforcement of arbitration agreements with respect to representative employment claims under California"s Private Attorneys General Act, which is applied to no other type of agreement, is pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act because the rule discriminates against arbitration agreements; and (2) whether a California rule that prohibits the enforcement of arbitration agreements with respect to representative employment claims under California"s Private Attorneys General Act is pre-empted by the FAA because the rule eviscerates bilateral arbitration agreements and thereby thwarts the objectives of the FAA.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
03/26/2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 26, 2018)
04/13/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2018 to May 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
04/17/2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2018.
04/26/2018Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. filed.
05/22/2018Brief of respondent Melinda Mandviwala in opposition filed.
06/01/2018Reply of petitioners Five Star Senior Living Inc. and FVE Managers, Inc. filed.
06/05/2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018.
06/25/2018Petition DENIED.