Five Star Senior Living Inc. v. Mandviwala
Petition for certiorari denied on June 25, 2018
Issue: (1) Whether a California rule that prohibits the enforcement of arbitration agreements with respect to representative employment claims under California"s Private Attorneys General Act, which is applied to no other type of agreement, is pre-empted by the Federal Arbitration Act because the rule discriminates against arbitration agreements; and (2) whether a California rule that prohibits the enforcement of arbitration agreements with respect to representative employment claims under California"s Private Attorneys General Act is pre-empted by the FAA because the rule eviscerates bilateral arbitration agreements and thereby thwarts the objectives of the FAA.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
03/26/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 26, 2018) |
04/13/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 26, 2018 to May 22, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
04/17/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 22, 2018. |
04/26/2018 | Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. filed. |
05/22/2018 | Brief of respondent Melinda Mandviwala in opposition filed. |
06/01/2018 | Reply of petitioners Five Star Senior Living Inc. and FVE Managers, Inc. filed. |
06/05/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/21/2018. |
06/25/2018 | Petition DENIED. |