Filson v. Browning
Petition for certiorari denied on June 4, 2018
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit failed to adhere to the deferential requirements of review required by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act when it relied on circuit precedent to define the contours of constitutional rights and merely substituted its own judgment for that of the Nevada Supreme Court by improperly engaging in independent fact-finding.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 01/22/2018 | Application (17A788) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 1, 2018 to April 2, 2018, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
| 01/24/2018 | Response to application from respondent Paul Browning filed. |
| 01/26/2018 | Application (17A788) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until April 2, 2018. |
| 04/02/2018 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 7, 2018) |
| 04/27/2018 | Brief of respondent Paul Browning in opposition filed. |
| 04/27/2018 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Paul Browning. |
| 05/11/2018 | Reply of petitioners Timothy Filson, et al. filed. |
| 05/15/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/31/2018. |
| 06/04/2018 | Petition DENIED. |
| 06/04/2018 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |