Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee v. FCC
Holding
Courts must apply the Chevron framework to an agency"s interpretation of a statutory ambiguity that concerns the scope of the agency"s statutory authority ( i.e., its jurisdiction).
Judgment
Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Antonin Scalia on May 20, 2013. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Kennedy and Justice Alito joined.
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioners in these cases.
Holding: Courts must apply the”Chevron“framework to an agency”s interpretation of a statutory ambiguity that concerns the scope of the agency”s statutory authority ( i.e., its jurisdiction).
Judgment:”Affirmed, 6-3, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on May 20, 2013. Justice Breyer filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Kennedy and Justice Alito joined.
Recommended Citation: Cable, Telecommunications, and Technology Committee v. FCC, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/cable-telecommunications-and-technology-committee-v-fcc/