C. S. v. McCrumb
Pending Petition
Issue
Whether post hoc speculation about emotional harm that speech could cause to other students is insufficient to meet Tinker’s “substantial disruption” standard.
Oct 27, 2025Application (25A524) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 10, 2025 to January 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Nov 7, 2025Application (25A524) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 9, 2026.
Jan 9, 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2026)Feb 16, 2026Waiver of Craig McCrumb, et al. not accepted for filing. (February 24, 2026)
Feb 24, 2026Waiver of right of respondent Craig McCrumb, et al. to respond filed.Feb 25, 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
Mar 3, 2026Response Requested. (Due April 2, 2026)
Mar 5, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2026 to May 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 6, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2026. See Rule 30.1.
Recommended Citation: C. S. v. McCrumb, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/c-s-v-mccrumb/