Broadnax v. Texas
Docket No.25-938
Op. BelowTex. Crim. App.
Issue
Whether the state’s considering race as a basis for striking prospective jurors, shown by its listing prospective jurors by race on a spreadsheet used during jury selection, and now confirmed by newly disclosed evidence of similar notations on a chart used during jury selection at Petitioner’s co-defendant’s trial and by newly obtained affidavits from three struck prospective Black jurors, violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment under Batson v. Kentucky.
Feb 4, 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 9, 2026)Feb 4, 2026Application (25A899) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.Mar 3, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 9, 2026 to March 30, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 6, 2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including March 25, 2026.
Mar 9, 2026Brief amicus curiae of NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. filed.Mar 25, 2026Brief of respondent Texas in opposition filed.Apr 8, 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2026.
Apr 8, 2026Reply of petitioner James Garfield Broadnax filed. (Distributed)Apr 13, 2026Response to application from respondent Texas filed.Recommended Citation: Broadnax v. Texas, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/broadnax-v-texas-5/