Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC v. Martin
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on March 18, 2019.
Issue
Whether plaintiffs, having failed to demonstrate that common issues predominate over individual issues as to their cause of action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3), may nevertheless obtain certification of issue classes for that cause of action under Rule 23(c)(4).
Oct 12, 2018Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 13, 2018)Nov 1, 2018Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al..Nov 13, 2018Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.Nov 13, 2018Waiver of right of respondents Terry Martin, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 20, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/7/2018.
Nov 29, 2018Response Requested. (Due January 2, 2019)
Dec 11, 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 2, 2019 to February 1, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 13, 2018Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 1, 2019.
Feb 1, 2019Brief of respondents Terry Martin, et al. in opposition filed.Feb 20, 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2019.
Feb 20, 2019Reply of petitioners Behr Dayton Thermal Products LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 18, 2019Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Behr Dayton Thermal Products, LLC v. Martin, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/behr-dayton-thermal-products-llc-v-martin/