AT&T Mobility LLC v. McArdle
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on June 1, 2020.
Issue
Whether California"s public-policy rule conditioning the enforceability of arbitration agreements on acquiescence to public-injunction proceedings is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
Feb 27, 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2020)Mar 18, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2020 to April 24, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 19, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 24, 2020.
Mar 24, 2020Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed. VIDED.Mar 25, 2020Brief amicus curiae of CTIA - The Wireless Association filed. VIDED.Mar 26, 2020Brief amici curiae of American Bankers Association; Consumer Bankers Association filed. VIDED.Mar 27, 2020Brief amici curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed. VIDED.Mar 30, 2020Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. VIDED.Apr 24, 2020Brief of respondent Steven McArdle in opposition filed.May 11, 2020Reply of petitioners AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. filed.May 12, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
Jun 1, 2020Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: AT&T Mobility LLC v. McArdle, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/att-mobility-llc-v-mcardle/