Arizona v. Martin
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on May 18, 2020.
Issue
Whether, when a jury expressly states it is "unable to agree" on a defendant"s guilt for a greater offense and convicts the defendant of a lesser offense, and the defendant successfully appeals his conviction, the hung-jury rule permits retrial of the greater offense or Green v. United States instead bars retrial of that offense.
Nov 7, 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 12, 2019)Dec 4, 2019Waiver of right of respondent Philip Martin to respond filed.
Dec 18, 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
Jan 6, 2020Response Requested. (Due February 5, 2020)
Jan 9, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 5, 2020 to March 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jan 13, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 6, 2020.
Feb 5, 2020Brief amici curiae of Kentucky, et al. filed.Feb 20, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 6, 2020 to April 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Feb 24, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 6, 2020.
Apr 6, 2020Brief of respondent Philip Martin in opposition filed.Apr 21, 2020Reply of petitioner State of Arizona filed. (Distributed)Apr 22, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
May 18, 2020Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Arizona v. Martin, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/arizona-v-martin/