Arizona v. California
Motion by Arizona for leave to file a complaint denied on February 24, 2020
Docket No.22O150
Feb 28, 2019Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.Mar 27, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2019 to May 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 29, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 24, 2019.
Apr 10, 2019Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner State of ArizonaMay 2, 2019Brief amicus curiae of National Taxpayers Union Foundation filed.May 3, 2019Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice Of The Defense Bar and the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center filed.May 3, 2019Brief amicus curiae of Researchers, Professors and Lecturers of Law filed.May 3, 2019Brief amicus curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation and Cato Institute filed.May 24, 2019Brief of respondent State of California in opposition filed.Jun 3, 2019Reply of petitioner State of Arizona filed.Jun 4, 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
Jun 24, 2019The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
Dec 9, 2019Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Dec 19, 2019Supplemental brief of State of Arizona in response to the brief for the United States as amicus curiae filed.Jan 8, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
Feb 14, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
Feb 24, 2020Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint DENIED. Justice Thomas, with whom Justice Alito joins, dissenting from denial of motion for leave to file complaint. (Detached Opinion)
Recommended Citation: Arizona v. California, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/arizona-v-california/