Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. Arrow Recycling Solutions, Inc.

Whether a generic choice-of-law provision in an otherwise broad arbitration agreement, one that does not reference a particular state, should be read to reflect intent by the parties to avoid preemption under the Federal Arbitration Act and instead to apply a rule of that state that limits or bars arbitration of an otherwise covered dispute despite the strong preference for enforcement of arbitration provisions as expressed in the Federal Arbitration Act.