Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on June 27, 2022.
Issue
Whether a licensee has Article III standing to challenge the validity of a patent covered by a license agreement that covers multiple patents. CVSG: 5/24/2022
Sep 3, 2021Application (21A39) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2021 to November 17, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Sep 9, 2021Application (21A39) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until November 17, 2021.
Nov 17, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)Dec 2, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2021 to January 19, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 3, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2022.
Dec 17, 2021Brief amici curiae of Engine Advocacy, et al. filed.Dec 20, 2021Brief amici curiae of Senator Patrick Leahy and Congressman Darrell Issa filed.Dec 20, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Unified Patents, LLC filed.Dec 20, 2021Brief amicus curiae of Thales filed.Jan 19, 2022Brief of respondent Qualcomm Incorporated in opposition filed.Feb 1, 2022Reply of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)Feb 2, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
Feb 22, 2022The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
May 24, 2022Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.Jun 6, 2022Supplemental brief of petitioner Apple Inc. filed. (Distributed)Jun 7, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
Jun 27, 2022Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/apple-inc-v-qualcomm-incorporated/