Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo, Inc.
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on June 13, 2022.
Issue
(1) What the appropriate standard is for determining whether a patent claim is "directed to" a patent-ineligible concept under step 1 of the two-step framework from Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International for determining whether an invention is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101; and (2) whether patent eligibility (at each step of the Supreme Court"s two-step framework) is a question of law for the court, based on the scope of the claims alone or a question of fact, based on the state of art at the time of the invention.
Dec 16, 2021Application (21A254) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 6, 2022 to March 7, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Dec 20, 2021Application (21A254) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 7, 2022.
Mar 7, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 11, 2022)Mar 22, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 11, 2022 to May 11, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 24, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 11, 2022.
May 5, 2022Brief of respondent Olo, Inc. in opposition filed.May 19, 2022Reply of petitioner Ameranth, Inc. filed. (Distributed)May 24, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/9/2022.
Jun 1, 2022Supplemental brief of petitioner Ameranth, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Jun 6, 2022Supplemental brief of respondent Olo, Inc. filed. (Distributed)Jun 13, 2022Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Ameranth, Inc. v. Olo, Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/ameranth-inc-v-olo-inc/